​​

The Equation of Absolute Infinity

A Mathematical Framework for Truth and the Divine

​

If mathematics is the language of absolute truth and God is posited as the ultimate truth, then it follows that mathematics, in its purest and most fundamental form, should encapsulate the very nature of God.

​​

Mathematics is the only truly universal language, a system of unyielding constancy across civilizations, dimensions, and epochs. Its axioms remain immutable:

​​

1 + 1 = 2

​​

A governing principle that transcends time and space.

This article proposes a mathematical equation that elucidates the underlying nature of existence, constrained by the rigorous laws of mathematics yet pointing toward the infinite.

 

The Ontology of "1"

At the core of numerical representation lies the most fundamental unit: 1. While numbers appear infinite in sequence, they are, in essence, mere iterations or subdivisions of 1.

For example:

​

1 + 1 + 1 = 3

​

Fractions and decimals are simply portions of 1:

​

50% = 1/2 = 0.5 of 1

​

Crucially, 1 is self-contained and complete:

​

1 = 100%

​

In mathematics, completeness necessitates boundaries, which are often denoted by parenthesis or brackets ( ).

This implies that 1 is finite, governed by its own constraints. Anything that can be precisely quantified must be finite, implying that even the observable universe, regardless of its vastness, is ultimately a bounded (1).

Thus, if 1 = 100% = Everything,

then the simplest formulation of a "Theory of Everything" would be:

(1)

​

The Fallacy of Infinity in a Finite System

Contemporary understanding of infinity is merely an exploration of boundless potential within (1). Even a hypothetical multiverse would exist within a larger (1).

True infinity (∞), however, is not a numerical value but a conceptual abstraction—an entity devoid of mathematical constraints. Attempting to encapsulate (∞) within an equation, such as:

​

(∞)

​

results in a paradox: a boundless entity cannot be meaningfully enclosed within brackets.

​

Yet (1), by itself, is inert without a governing mechanism for change. This governing principle is encapsulated by the foundational operations of mathematics:

​

Addition (+) and Subtraction (-)

​​

(+|-) addition and subtraction can explain themselves and every other type of calculation.

 

Example

 

(1+1+1) + (1+1+1) = (1+1+1+1+1+1)

​Inside every (1) we have (+|-).

 

 Man = (1) and has (+|-) within himself.

​

These fundamental operations delineate the very structure of reality:

• Matter & Antimatter

• Proton & Electron

• Positive & Negative Forces

• Good & Evil

• Light & Dark

Existence itself is a dialectical balance between opposing forces,

governed by (+ | -) within (1).

​

The Paradox of Totality

Physics operates within a calculable framework, exemplified by Einstein's equation:

E = mc²

which defines all observable energy-matter interactions. But what happens when we attempt to extend our calculations beyond this defined system?

​

Consider the question:

1 + (100) = ?

​

If (100) represents the totality of calculable existence, then no numerical sum beyond it is meaningful within the framework of mathematics. Reformulating:

1 + (finite) = ?
1 + (mathematics) = ?
1 + (universe) = ?
1 + (everything) = ?
1 + (E = mc²) = ?
1 + (+|-) = ?

The answer must necessarily transcend the confines of brackets. Thus, the equation of Absolute Infinity emerges:

​

1 + (+|-) = ∞

or

1 + ( 1 ) = ∞

​

This formulation preserves mathematical coherence while acknowledging the existence of an external, transcendent domain beyond mathematics itself.

​

Empirical Corroboration in Physics

Einstein's theory of relativity provides empirical reinforcement:

"If an object approaches the speed of light (186,000 miles per second), its mass asymptotically approaches infinity, requiring infinite energy for further acceleration."

This mirrors our equation:

1 + (1) = ∞

The attempt to add (1) beyond a defined system results in an asymptotic approach to infinity, reinforcing the notion that (∞) represents an ontological threshold rather than a computable quantity.

​

 

Mathematics studies the (+ | - ) laws to understand the (1) value.

 

Science studies the (1) value to understand the ( + | - ) laws.

 

 

​

Bridging Science and Spirituality

Mathematics investigates (+ | - ) to comprehend (1).
Science explores (1) to understand (+ | - ).
Quantum mechanics asserts that for "nothing" to give rise to "something," governing laws must preexist. This aligns precisely with our equation:

+ (+ | - )

Even though a law itself is intangible (not equal to "1"), it must exist a priori for any structured system to manifest.

​​​

​

Theological Implications

This mathematical structure finds resonance within religious philosophy:

God is One (1) → 100%

Yet He is beyond comprehension (∞)

​

It also provides a logical framework for moral dualism and free will. In theological eschatology, final judgment involves a reckoning of deeds:

​

If good outweighs evil:
1 + ( + > - ) = + ∞

Heaven

​

If evil outweighs good:
1 + ( + < - ) = - ∞

Hell

​

This framework aligns with scriptural descriptions. The Quranic Surah 112 states:

​Say He is One (1)

On whom all depend (+)

He begets not (+), nor is He begotten (-)

And there is none like Him (∞)

​

Mathematically, this translates as:

1 + (+|-) = ∞

Even Georg Cantor, the mathematician who formalized the study of infinity, equated Absolute Infinity (∞) with God, seeing no contradiction between mathematics and divinity.

​

+(+|-) Atheist, understand natural law exist and Quanta

 

(∞) = ∞ Pantheist, the universe is God

 

(1) = ∞ Buddha said, look within yourself (1) and find your personal (∞) nirvana.

 

( 1 + (+|-) = ∞) Christianity,

father 1=∞

holy spirit +

son (+|-)

Exterior brackets trinity

(holy spirit is the deliverer of the law, the son is earthly bound (+-) son)

Even though Jesus can have potentially (∞) possibilities within him, he can never be God. That is why he always said the father ∞ is greater than I (1)

​

The Limits of Paradoxes

Paradoxes like Pi (π) or Hilbert’s Infinite Hotel are not true infinities. Pi is infinite in potential representation but remains constrained by the geometry of a circle. Similarly, an "infinite hotel" still exists within a definable space. Absolute Infinity (∞), by contrast, remains unbounded by any mathematical law.

​

The Illusion of Zero

Zero (0) is a conceptual placeholder rather than a true existential state. If something has ever existed, it cannot become absolute nothingness. Even in abstraction, an idea, once conceived, occupies a state of existence within cognitive space-time.

Thus, absolute zero is an ontological impossibility, reinforcing the notion that nothingness itself is paradoxical.

​

Conclusion

The equation of Absolute Infinity remains consistent with both mathematical rigor and metaphysical inquiry:

1 + (+|-) = ∞

​

This equation suggests that mathematics, while definitive within its constraints, ultimately points beyond itself. Whether described as Absolute Infinity, Allah, God, or the Ultimate Reality, it signifies a domain that transcends calculable existence.

A reality beyond (1).
An existence beyond (+|-).
A truth beyond mathematics itself.

​

∞ Bless you all